Biosimilar Uptake of Filgrastim and Impact on Spending in Medicare Part D from 2015 to 2019

2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars

A retrospective, cross-sectional review reported significant uptake of biosimilar filgrastim products in Medicare Part D from 2015 to 2019 being associated with a small decrease in aggregate spending, essentially unchanged per-unit spending, and increased spending per beneficiary on filgrastim products, all attributed to the inability of Medicare Part D to directly negotiate prices with manufacturers.

A retrospective, cross-sectional review evaluated utilization trends of filgrastim biosimilars and impact on spending among Medicare Part D beneficiaries. The results of the analysis were presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting.

Using the 2015 to 2019 Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Event data, this study assessed annual spending, number of beneficiaries, number of claims, spending per beneficiary, and spending per dosage unit of filgrastim, as well as per the biosimilars filgrastim-sndz and tbo-filgrastim.

The total aggregate Part D spending on filgrastim products was $78 million in 2019, of which the biosimilars share was $44 million (56%); that increased from $1.8 million (2%) in 2015. From 2015 to 2019, total spending on filgrastim reference decreased by 58%. Whereas biosimilar uptake progressively increased every year, total aggregate spending on all filgrastim forms decreased only 7% from 2015 to 2019 ($84 million to $78 million). From 2015 to 2019, for all 3 filgrastim forms, trends in spending were average spending per claim ($3193-$2549; –20%), average spending per beneficiary ($5880-$6722; +15%), and average spending per dosage unit of filgrastim ($583 vs $571; –2%).

Based on these results, the significant uptake of biosimilar filgrastim products in Medicare Part D from 2015 to 2019 was associated with a small decrease in aggregate spending, essentially unchanged per-unit spending, and increased spending per beneficiary on filgrastim products, all attributed to the inability of Medicare Part D to directly negotiate prices with manufacturers. These results are in contrast with the significant cost-savings associated with biosimilar filgrastim uptake in Medicare Part B and Medicaid programs.

Source: Hussaini S, Gupta A, Anderson KE, et al. Biosimilar uptake of filgrastim and impact on spending in Medicare Part D from 2015 to 2019. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl_28):67.

Related Items

Beyond the Jargon: Explaining Biosimilars to Patients
By Sharon S. Gentry, MSN, RN, HON-ONN-CG, AOCN, CBCN
March 2025 Vol 16, No 3
As biosimilars increase in the care arena of cancer treatment, it is critical that patients be informed of this classification of treatment in a way that allows for shared decision-making.
Panel: Biosimilar Adoption Dependent on Various Stakeholder Economics
January 2022 Vol 13, No 1
Thirty-one biosimilar products have been approved by the FDA, 20 of which have been launched in the United States.
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of the Bevacizumab Biosimilar MIL60 versus Bevacizumab Reference in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous NSCLC
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars
The results of a randomized, double-blind phase 3 study established the equivalence of bevacizumab reference to its biosimilar MIL60 in terms of clinical efficacy, safety, population pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.
Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship
JONS

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive:

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
     
    Profession or Role
    Primary Specialty or Disease State
    Country