Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim-cbqv Demonstrates Similar Clinical Efficacy to the Pegfilgrastim Reference in a Real-World Setting

2020 Year in Review - Biosimilars

A proof-of-concept study showed the feasibility of conducting comparative-effectiveness research at scale to promote value-based decision-making in oncology; it also confirmed efficacy equivalence between the biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim reference for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.

To achieve cost-savings, it is imperative that practices evaluate their utilization of both cancer-directed and supportive therapies. The Value Monitor is a tool that uses real-world data to provide statistically rigorous comparative-effectiveness research at scale. To provide proof of concept, the Value Monitor was used to compare the efficacy of the biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv with pegfilgrastim reference, both of which are indicated for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer who were receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy; these results were reported at the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology Virtual Scientific Program.

Using the Value Monitor, a matched cohort retrospective analysis was performed in patients with breast cancer receiving pegfilgrastim-cbqv or pegfilgrastim between January 1, 2017, and August 31, 2019. Patients treated with pegfilgrastim-cbqv were matched to those treated with pegfilgrastim by age (within 5 years), gender, Oncology Care Model participation status, and date of treatment (within 90 days). The efficacy end point was neutropenia rate and/or an absolute neutrophil count <1500; neutropenia was defined as the presence of a neutropenia International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, revision code (D70*).

A total of 496 patients were identified and included in the pegfilgrastim-cbqv cohort, and were matched to 5 pegfilgrastim patients. The incidence of neutropenia was similar between the groups: 28.6% in the pegfilgrastim-cbqv cohort and 29.1% in the pegfilgrastim cohort (McNemar’s P value, 0.82).

The biosimilar showed efficacy equivalence to its pegfilgrastim reference for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer who were receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The authors attributed the higher incidence rates relative to those previously reported in the published literature to the very broad study definition of neutropenia. The proof-of-concept study also demonstrated the feasibility of performing comparative-effectiveness research at scale using the Value Monitor to inform value-based clinical decisions.

Reference
Webster J, et al. ASCO 2020. Abstract e19273.

Related Items

Beyond the Jargon: Explaining Biosimilars to Patients
By Sharon S. Gentry, MSN, RN, HON-ONN-CG, AOCN, CBCN
March 2025 Vol 16, No 3
As biosimilars increase in the care arena of cancer treatment, it is critical that patients be informed of this classification of treatment in a way that allows for shared decision-making.
Panel: Biosimilar Adoption Dependent on Various Stakeholder Economics
January 2022 Vol 13, No 1
Thirty-one biosimilar products have been approved by the FDA, 20 of which have been launched in the United States.
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of the Bevacizumab Biosimilar MIL60 versus Bevacizumab Reference in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous NSCLC
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars
The results of a randomized, double-blind phase 3 study established the equivalence of bevacizumab reference to its biosimilar MIL60 in terms of clinical efficacy, safety, population pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.
Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship
JONS

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive:

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
     
    Profession or Role
    Primary Specialty or Disease State
    Country