RELAY Results: Patients with Exon 21 L858R or Exon 19 Deletion Mutations of EGFR Benefit from Ramucirumab + Erlotinib

2020 Year in Review: Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Dual treatment with ramucirumab and erlotinib produced similar results in patients with ex21 and ex19 mutations.

Patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR mutations have varied outcomes when treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Patients with metastatic NSCLC and an exon 21 L858R (ex21) EGFR mutation have a lower reported benefit compared with patients with metastatic NSCLC and an exon 19 deletion (ex19) EGFR mutation when treated with an EGFR-TKI. The phase 3 RELAY trial reported that the combination of the anti–vascular endothelial growth factor receptor antibody ramucirumab and the EGFR-TKI erlotinib showed better progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo and erlotinib. The authors reported the efficacy and safety of the dual treatment of ramucirumab + erlotinib by EGFR mutation type during the ESMO Virtual Congress 2020.

Patients with metastatic NSCLC and an ex21 or ex19 mutation that had no central nervous system metastases were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups. The groups received 150 mg daily of erlotinib and either 10 mg/kg of ramucirumab or placebo every 2 weeks until patients met Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1–defined progression or experienced unacceptable toxicity. The results of the study were stratified by various measures that included EGFR mutation type and region (East Asia/other). The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, safety, time to second progression, and biomarker analyses. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimation were used to analyze data, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated on the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 scale.

Most patients were of Asian descent, including 83% of patients with EGFR ex21 and 72% with EGFR ex19 mutations. Patients with both types of mutations had similar rates of dose adjustments, grade ≥3 AEs, and serious AEs. PFS, ORR, and DCR were improved in both mutant types by ramucirumab + erlotinib compared with erlotinib alone (Table). Median follow-up time was 20.7 months (range, 0.1-35.4 months).

Patients with both ex21 and ex19 mutations had similar benefits when treated with ramucirumab + erlotinib, and this was consistent with the intention-to-treat analysis. The authors concluded that ramucirumab + erlotinib dual treatment can be a first-line therapy for patients with metastatic NSCLC ex19 or ex 21 EGFR mutations.

  Ex19 Ex21
RAM+ERL
(N = 123)
PBO+ERL
(N = 120)
RAM+ERL
(N = 99)
PBO+ERL
(N = 105)
PFS        
Median, months 19.6 12.5 19.4 11.2
HRa (95% CI)a; log-rank P valuea 0.651 (0.469-0.903); P = .01 0.618 (0.437-0.874); P = .006
1-year PFS rate, % 74 54 70 47
ORR, % 79 83 74 66
DCR, % 96 96 95 95
DOR, no. responders 97 99 73 69
Median, months 18.2 11.0 16.2 11.1
HR (95% CI)a 0.542 (0.380-0.772) 0.731 (0.493-1.083)
aUnstratified.

CI indicates confidence interval; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; ERL, erlotinib; ex19, exon 19 deletion EGFR mutation; ex21, exon 21 L858R EGFR mutation; HR, hazard ratio; PBO, placebo; PFS, progression-free survival; ORR, objective response rate; RAM, ramucirumab.

Reference
Nakagawa K, et al. ESMO 2020. Abstract 1294P.

Related Items

Post-CRT Durvalumab: A Game-Changer for SCLC
November 2024 Vol 15, No 11
Durvalumab consolidation therapy improved overall and progression-free survival in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer that did not progress after standard-of-care concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Sotorasib Conveys Long-Term Benefits in Patients With KRAS G12C–Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Web Exclusives
Analysis of the long-term results of the CodeBreak 100 clinical trial showed that sotorasib demonstrated long-term efficacy, in particular among patients with low initial circulating tumor DNA values.
NGS Testing More Cost-Effective Than SGT in Oncology
Web Exclusives
A recent study showed that next-generation sequencing testing has superior cost benefit when compared with single-gene testing for multiple cancer types, including non–small cell lung cancer.
Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship
JONS

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive:

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
     
    Profession or Role
    Primary Specialty or Disease State
    Country