Background: Breast cancer is a highly emotional diagnosis; patient experience should be monitored to limit emotional distress.1-6
Objectives: By interviewing patients, seek to find experiences that made a quality impact for patients to implement throughout our program to enhance their experience.
Methods: Postsurgery breast cancer patients surveyed. Patients interviewed in one-on-one setting. Interview guide tool developed by administrator and nurse navigator. Questions were open-ended format. Questions included presentation for finding cancer; experience during testing and diagnosis; surgeon’s office experience; hospital surgery preoperative, imaging, surgical, and postoperative arenas; follow-up care received; survivorship experience; and general feedback.
Results: Eight patients were selected, having completed their journey within 30 days prior to study. Four patients completed interviews. Ages ranged from 38 to 67 years. Presentation revealed 4/4 had MD review of imaging with them in person; 2/4 had immediate biopsy after imaging diagnosis; 1/4 preferred to wait for primary care provider consult; and 1/4 needed pause for authorization. Surgery feedback included requests for camisole with pouches for drains at time of surgery (3/4); 3/4 had difficulties finding preoperative areas; 4/4 appreciated preoperative testing was “one-stop shop” and could return to routine prior to surgery; 4/4 requested virtual support group to help prepare for surgery; 4/4 liked phone preregistration; 2/2 found the pectoral blocks to be beneficial for pain control; 4/4 appreciated the same nurse to contact patient for introduction prior to surgery and follow-up postdischarge. 1/1 did not like the nonroutine process for very important patient “VIP,” as 1/1 was given her sedative, another nurse voiced short-term memory loss in seniors; 1/1 family was set up for text updates during surgery, and none occurred. For 3/4 the physician office experience showed staff was not welcoming, could not explain results, and didn’t seem as knowledgeable as expected. 4/4 appreciated navigator involvement at diagnosis; 2/2 found a staging poster in office helpful and would have liked a copy; 2/4 finding way to office needed improving; and 1/4 preferred not to receive genetic or diagnostic test results via phone. 4/4 requested better education about drain removal, pain with implant expansion. Survivorship evaluation revealed 4/4 were unable to move on emotionally in a self-identified timely manner, and 4/4 worry if the cancer will come back.
Conclusions: By interviewing patients, a candid format for feedback was given. When concluded, met with physicians and gave them feedback. Changes made were: (1) added camisoles, given immediately postop; (2) during phone preregistration, scripting is used, including way finding for locations; (3) nurses call the patient the evening before surgery; (4) perioperative director to educates staff on appropriate communication; (5) navigator consulted at time of diagnosis and provides staging sheets to patients; (6) physicians updating office processes; and (7) patients are being educated in detail about the JP drains and the injections for tissue expanders.
We will be doing follow-up interviews to ascertain if the patient-recommended changes made a difference and to obtain any new recommendations from the patients.
Keep up to date with the latest news from us via social networks:
To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.