Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma

Web Exclusives

Bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) represents a standard initial treatment option for both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients with multiple myeloma.1 The findings from a phase 1b study investigating the combination of isatuximab with VRd (Isa-VRd) demonstrated a favorable safety profile, initial clinical efficacy, and significant responses in patients who are ineligible for transplantation or who do not have immediate plans for autologous stem-cell transplant. IMROZ (NCT03319667) is the first global phase 3 study investigating the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD38, isatuximab, in combination with VRd in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).1

A total of 446 patients aged ≤80 years were randomized 3:2 to receive either Isa-VRd or VRd alone.1,2 The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, minimal residual disease (MRD)-CR (next-generation sequencing, 10−5) rate, very good partial response rate or better, and overall survival (OS). Patient characteristics were well-balanced between arms.1,2

The primary endpoint of IMROZ was met. At a median follow-up of 5 years (59.7 months), Isa-VRd followed by isatuximab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Rd) led to a statistically significant reduction in the risk of progression or death by 40.4%.1 A benefit of PFS was noted with Isa-VRd compared with VRd in the majority of subgroups, including several challenging-to-treat populations characterized by adverse prognostic factors. Isa-VRd followed by Isa-Rd resulted in deep response rates, with a significant improvement in the MRD-negative CR rate, as well as higher rates of MRD negativity and sustained MRD negativity for ≥12 months.1 At a median follow-up period of 5 years, OS data remain immature; nonetheless, a positive trend has been noted for the Isa-VRd treatment group, indicating a 22.4% reduction in risk when compared with the VRd group. Isa-VRd was well-tolerated, and the safety profile remains consistent with the known safety profiles of each agent. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 70.7% of patients in the Isa-VRd arm and 26.0% of patients in the VRd arm. In the Isa-VRd arm, TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 22.8% of patients versus 26% of patients in the VRd arm.1

A frailty subgroup analysis was conducted of the IMROZ study.2 Patients with a frailty score of 0/1 were considered non-frail, and those with scores ≥2 were classified as frail. After a median follow-up of 59.7 months, Isa-VRd led to improved median PFS versus VRd in both the frail and non-frail subgroups. Among frail patients, those who received Isa-VRd were more than twice as likely to achieve MRD negativity as those who received VRd (50.7% vs 22.8%, respectively, at 10−5 by next-generation sequencing).2 The OS data are immature; however, there does not appear to be an increase in mortality in the Isa-VRd arm. The rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were similar between arms in both the frail and non-frail subgroups.2

The improved effectiveness of Isa-VRd, followed by Isa-Rd, paired with a consistent safety profile, represents a vital treatment choice for frontline disease management, thereby establishing Isa-VRd as a new treatment option for patients aged ≤80 years with NDMM who are not candidates for transplantation.1 In addition, considering the efficacy results and the acceptable safety profile, Isa-VRd serves as a significant treatment alternative for patients with treatment-ineligible NDMM, irrespective of their frailty status.2

References

  1. Facon, T, Dimopoulos MA, Leleu X, et al. Phase 3 study results of isatuximab,
  2. bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-VRd) versus VRd for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (IMROZ). Presented at: International Myeloma Society 21st Annual Meeting & Exposition. September 25-28, 2024; Riocentro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Abstract 7500.

  3. Manier S, Dimopoulos MA, Leleu AP, et al. Isatuximab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) transplant-ineligible patients: frailty subgroup analysis of IMROZ. Presented at: International Myeloma Society 21st Annual Meeting & Exposition. September 25-28, 2024; Riocentro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Poster P-426.

Related Items

Isatuximab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Induction Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Phase 3 GMMG-HD7 Trial
Web Exclusives
This article summarizes 2 analyses from the phase 3 GMMG-HD7 trial presented at ASH 2024, as well as the FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee support for the use of minimal residual disease as an accelerated approval endpoint in multiple myeloma clinical trials.
Isa-KRd in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results From the GMMG-CONCEPT Trial and the IFM 2020-02 MIDAS Study
Web Exclusives
In this article, the results from 2 studies of Isa-KRd in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) are summarized, with the GMMG-CONCEPT trial focusing on high-risk NDMM and the IFM 2020-02 MIDAS study focusing on transplant-eligible NDMM.
Daratumumab-Containing Quadruplet Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients With High Cytogenetic Risk Who Are Eligible for Transplantation
Web Exclusives
This article summarizes a post-hoc analysis of data from the MASTER study and the GRIFFIN study of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities.
Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship
JONS

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive:

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
     
    Profession or Role
    Primary Specialty or Disease State
    Country