Updated Results from MajesTEC-1: Phase 1/2 Study of Teclistamab, a BCMA x CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in RRMM

2021 Year in Review - Multiple Myeloma —February 23, 2022

Categories:

Multiple Myeloma

Data from the ongoing phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study suggested that treatment with the BCMA x CD3 bispecific antibody teclistamab induced deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM, with a manageable safety profile.

Teclistamab (JNJ-64007957) is a T-cell–redirecting, bispecific IgG4 antibody that targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and CD3 receptors to induce T-cell–mediated cytotoxicity of BCMA-expressing myeloma cells. Teclistamab is under investigation in the MajesTEC-1 trial. The ongoing, 3-part, phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study is evaluating the BCMA x CD3 bispecific antibody teclistamab in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Results from the phase 1 portion of the study (parts 1 and 2) were previously reported and showed that teclistamab (median follow-up 6.1 months) was well-tolerated and had promising antitumor activity at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Updated results for the phase 1/2 portion of MajesTEC-1 (part 1-3) were reported at the 2021 ASH Annual Meeting and summarized here.

The study enrolled patients aged ≥18 years with MM diagnosis per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, who had measurable disease, and were exposed to a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 antibody. Patients were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to established therapies (phase 1) or received ≥3 previous lines of therapy (phase 2). The primary objectives in phase 1 were to identify the RP2D and to characterize safety and tolerability of teclistamab at the RP2D. The primary objective in phase 2 was to evaluate the antitumor activity of teclistamab at the RP2D; the primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate. Patients treated at the RP2D received a weekly dose of subcutaneous teclistamab 1500 µg/kg following step-up doses of 60 µg/kg and 300 µg/kg. The data cutoff date was September 7, 2021.

In phases 1 and 2, a total of 165 patients were treated at the RP2D; of these, 40 patients were treated in phase 1 and 125 patients in phase 2. The median age of the total population was 64.0 years; 14.5% of patients were aged ≥75 years and 58.2% were male. In terms of previous lines of therapy, it was a heavily pretreated population, with a median of 5 previous lines of therapy; 100% were triple-class–exposed, 70.3% were penta-drug–exposed, 77.6% were triple-class refractory, and 30.3% were penta-drug refractory.

In phase 2, there were no new safety signals identified. In all patients treated at RP2D (N = 165), the most common nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were cytokine release syndrome (71.5%), injection-site erythema (25.5%), and fatigue (24.8%). The majority of cytokine release syndrome events were grade 1/2; 1 patient had a transient grade 3 event. Median time to onset was 2 days (range, 1-6 days), and median duration was 2 days (range, 1-9 days). The most common hematologic AEs were neutropenia (65.5%), anemia (49.7%), and thrombocytopenia (38.2%). The majority of grade 3/4 AEs were hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia (57%), anemia (34.5%), and thrombocytopenia (21.2%). Five (3%) patients had immune effector-cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, all of which were grade 1/2 severity and resolved.

Pharmacokinetic data show that teclistamab exposure at the RP2D was sustained across the dosing interval and exceeded target exposure levels. Pharmacodynamic data for phase 1/2 patients treated at the RP2D showed induction of proinflammatory cytokines and T-cell activation.

In the phase 1 (N = 40) and phase 2 portion (N = 110) of the study, updated efficacy data (at a median follow-up of 7.8 months) showed that teclistamab treatment at RP2D yielded response rates of 62%, very good partial response or better rate of 58%, and complete response or better rate of 28.7%, which were consistent with previously reported data. Compared with previously reported data, responses among responders with longer follow-up were durable and deepened over time (median follow-up of 9.5 months vs 7.1 months). At data cutoff, the majority (91.4% [85 of 93]) of responders continued on treatment. Median duration of response has not been reached; the 6-month duration of response rate was 92.5%.

Data from the MajesTEC-1 study suggested that teclistamab monotherapy induced deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM, with a manageable safety profile, warranting further investigation.

Source: Moreau P, Usmani SZ, Garfall AL, et al. Updated results from MajesTEC-1: phase 1/2 study of teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen x CD3 bispecific antibody, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2021;138(suppl 1):896.

Related Articles
Multiple Myeloma Year in Review Introduction
2022 Year in Review - Multiple Myeloma
This edition of Year in Review is focused on multiple myeloma (MM), a disease for which the treatment landscape has seen tremendous growth resulting in major favorable changes in patient outcomes. New treatments have been approved and novel classes of agents continue to be investigated, particularly in the relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) setting. We are providing this Year in Review series to disseminate the latest information on treatment advances in 2022 to clinicians in a timely and effective manner.
Addition of ASCT to Triplet Induction and Lenalidomide Maintenance to Progression: Results from the DETERMINATION Trial
2022 Year in Review - Multiple Myeloma
The addition of ASCT to triplet induction with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) and lenalidomide maintenance resulted in significant PFS benefit versus RVd alone.
Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Induction Followed by Daratumumab Maintenance Achieved Durable Responses in Patients with RRMM and NDMM
2022 Year in Review - Multiple Myeloma
Final results from LYRA demonstrated robust responses with dara + CyBorD induction, which deepened with dara maintenance.
Last modified: August 10, 2023

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive:

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
     
     
    Profession or Role
    Primary Specialty or Disease State
    Country