Bevacizumab + Osimertinib Did Not Increase Progression-Free Survival versus Osimertinib Alone in Patients with Advanced Adenocarcinoma and EGFR T790M Mutations

2020 Year in Review: Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer —February 6, 2021


Lung Cancer

Study results show no increase in progression-free survival with combination treatment of osimertinib and bevacizumab compared with osimertinib alone for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and an EGFR T790M mutation.

Several studies of first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) showed that dual treatment with an EGFR-TKI and an angiogenic inhibitor had potential as a treatment strategy for patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. In particular, a preclinical study showed that a dual EGFR-TKI + angiogenic inhibitor treatment strategy presented promising results in an EGFR T790M–mutated model. Based on these initial studies, the authors sought to test the efficacy and safety of dual bevacizumab + osimertinib treatment in patients with EGFR T790M–mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma. They presented the results during the ESMO Virtual Congress 2020.

Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and an EGFR T790M mutation treated with a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg daily; N = 41) or osimertinib + bevacizumab (15 mg/kg divided every 3 weeks; N = 81). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); the secondary end points were overall response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), and safety. The authors hypothesized a 0.55 improvement in PFS in the osimertinib + bevacizumab cohort compared with osimertinib alone. To achieve this, ≥80 patients were needed to provide an 80% power and a 20% 2-sided significance.

The median age of patients was 68 years (range, 41-82 years), 41% were male, 7% had stage III cancer, 70% had stage IV cancer, 22% had a cancer recurrence, 46% had a performance status of 0, 54% had a performance status of 1, 26% had brain metastasis, and 21% had a history of cytotoxic chemotherapy.

The median PFS was 9.4 months for the osimertinib + bevacizumab arm compared with 13.5 months for osimertinib alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.08; P = .20). The median TTF was 8.4 months for the osimertinib + bevacizumab arm compared with 11.2 months for osimertinib alone (HR, 1.54; P = .12). The osimertinib + bevacizumab arm did not reach a median OS, whereas the osimertinib-alone arm had a median OS of 22.1 months (P = .96). The ORR was 68% for the osimertinib + bevacizumab arm and 54% for the osimertinib-alone arm. The most common adverse events with a grade ≥3 rating for the osimertinib + bevacizumab arm were proteinuria (23%), hypertension (20%), and infection (10%).

The authors concluded that the dual treatment of osimertinib + bevacizumab for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and an EGFR T790M mutation did not show increased PFS compared with osimertinib alone.

Toi Y, et al. ESMO 2020. Abstract 1259O.

Related Articles
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Releases Recommendations to Increase Cancer Biomarker Testing
Web Exclusives
The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network has published data that demonstrate there are multiple barriers to biomarker testing access and released recommendations that address these barriers.
Sotorasib Demonstrates Efficacy in CodeBreaK 100 Phase 2 Study Results
Web Exclusives
Sotorasib has shown promising antitumor activity in phase 2 of a clinical trial of patients with heavily treated advanced NSCLC.
Results of an International Study Identify Barriers to Molecular Testing in NSCLC
Web Exclusives
Recently released survey responses identified multiple barriers to, and dissatisfaction with, the current state of molecular testing in lung cancer.
Last modified: February 8, 2021

Subscribe to the Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship®

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
    Profession or Role
    Primary Specialty or Disease State
  • Please enter your mailing address.

    Address Line 2
    Zip Code