PACIFIC: Practice-Changing Trial in Stage III Unresectable NSCLC

December 2018 Vol 9, No 12

The PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab showed an overall survival benefit in patients with unresectable stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase 3 PACIFIC trial.

Durvalumab improved survival by 32% versus placebo in patients who had not progressed on concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This is the first time a study has demonstrated a survival advantage, and results suggest that durvalumab will be a new standard of care in this setting.

Results from the trial were greeted with enthusiasm at the IASLC 19th World Conference on Lung Cancer and were published simultaneously in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The survival analysis showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference in overall survival for durvalumab versus placebo in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

“We saw improvements in progression-free survival, time to distant metastases, and emergence of new lesions with durvalumab, and the drug was well tolerated. This is the first study in many years to support a survival advantage for unresectable stage III NSCLC with no progression following chemoradiotherapy,” said lead author Scott J. Antonia, MD, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.

PACIFIC is a positive trial with a 32% improvement in survival, and is a new standard of care, according to Everett Vokes, MD, chair of the Department of Medicine at University of Chicago, IL, who was formal discussant of the trial.

About 15% to 30% of patients with locally advanced unresectable stage III NSCLC are cured with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy with curative intent.

“We’ve been stuck with those numbers for decades. Last year, we saw an 11.2-month improvement in progression-free survival with durvalumab in the PACIFIC trial. Today we see improved overall survival,” Dr Antonia stated.

The randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PACIFIC trial was conducted at 235 investigative sites in 26 countries and enrolled 713 patients who did not progress after chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to durvalumab or placebo 1 to 42 days after radiation and treated every 2 weeks for up to 12 months or disease progression.

“We took all comers regardless of PD-L1 expression,” Dr Antonia told the audience.

Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 treatment arms. The 12-month overall survival rate was 83.1% for durvalumab versus 75.3% for placebo. The 24-month overall survival rate was 66.3% versus 55.6%, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached in the durvalumab group and was 28.7 months for placebo, representing a 32% improvement in survival for the PD-L1 inhibitor (P = .0025).

Updated analysis showed median progression-free survival of 16.8 months with durvalumab versus 5.6 months with placebo (P <.001), an 11.2-month improvement.

PD-L1 testing was obtained prior to chemoradiotherapy. More than one-third of patients in PACIFIC had unknown PD-L1 status. Patients with the lowest level of PD-L1 expression (<1%) did not benefit from durvalumab.

The time to death or distant metastasis was longer in the durvalumab group: median of 28.3 months versus 16.2 months for placebo.

No new safety signals emerged during the trial. Grade 3/4 adverse events of any cause occurred in 30.5% of the durvalumab group and 26.1% of the placebo group. Discontinuations due to adverse events were reported in 15.4% and 9.8%, respectively. The most frequent events leading to discontinuation were pneumonitis (4.8% of the durvalumab group and 2.6% of placebo patients).

Serious adverse events were reported in 29.1% of the durvalumab group and 23.1% of the placebo group. Death due to adverse events occurred in 4.4% and 6.4%, respectively.

Related Articles
Exploring AONN+ National Evidence-Based Navigation Metrics Outcomes at ACCC
Web Exclusives

Danelle Johnston, MSN, RN, HON-ONN-CG, OCN, and Tricia Strusowski, RN, MS, recapped their recent presentation from the ACCC 46th Annual Meeting & Cancer Center Business Summit, in which they discussed the National Evidence-Based Oncology Navigation Metrics: Multisite Exploratory Study to Demonstrate Value and Sustainability of Navigation Programs. The study was launched in June 2018 as a collaborative effort between the Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators (AONN+), Chartis Oncology Solutions, and the American Cancer Society (ACS).

Genetics, Genomics, and You: A Primer for Oncology Navigators
April 2019 Vol 10, No 4
Nurses and navigators play a crucial role in teaching patients about genetics and genomics, as well as in gathering the vital information necessary to actually carry out genetic testing and allowing patients to take control of their genetic inheritance.
What’s Hot and Trending in Oncology Care
April 2019 Vol 10, No 4
At the 2018 AONN+ Annual Conference, attendees heard a rapid-fire rundown of some of the most newsworthy, and sometimes controversial, topics in cancer care.
Last modified: August 10, 2023

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive:

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
    Profession or Role
    Primary Specialty or Disease State