Pralsetinib and Selpercatinib Evaluated as Treatment for Patients with RET Gene Fusion–Positive NSCLC

2020 Year in Review: Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer —February 6, 2021

Categories:

Lung Cancer

Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment options for patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC.

Selpercatinib and pralsetinib inhibit oncogenic RET alterations, which are targetable oncogenic drivers in multiple tumor types, including non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).1,2

Investigators in the global, multicenter phase 1/2 LIBRETTO-001 trial studied selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC.1 Following the phase 1 dose-escalation portion of the trial, patients were treated with twice-daily oral selpercatinib 160 mg.1 The primary study end point was objective response rate; secondary end points included duration of response and safety.1

Among patients with NSCLC who were treated with a median of 3 prior systemic platinum-based regimens, treatment with selpercatinib resulted in an (investigator assessed) objective response rate of 70%.1  Response rates did not differ by number or type of prior therapies or by fusion partner.1 Median duration of response was 20.3 months with 62% of 73 responders censored at a median follow-up of 14.8 months.1 The investigator-assessed objective response rate for the 39 treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC who received selpercatinib was 90% (including 2 responses pending confirmation at the time of data analysis).1 Median duration of response was not reached; 82% of 33 confirmed responses were ongoing after follow-up of 7.4 months (median).1

Dry mouth (33%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (25%), increased alanine aminotransferase (24%), hypertension (23%), diarrhea (20%), and fatigue (17%) were the most common TRAEs that occurred in ≥15% of the 702 patients who were treated with selpercatinib for any tumor type.1 Two percent of patients discontinued selpercatinib for TRAEs.1

In the phase 1/2 ARROW study, patients who were treated with once-daily oral pralsetinib 400 mg demonstrated an overall response rate of 73% in 26 treatment-naïve patients and 61% in 80 platinum-exposed patients who have RET fusion–positive NSCLC.2 Overall response rate was similar regardless of prior therapies, central nervous system involvement, or RET fusion partner.2

In the safety population for pralsetinib (N = 354, including NSCLC and other tumor types), the majority of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1 or grade 2.2 These included increased aspartate aminotransferase (31%), anemia (22%), increased alanine aminotransferase (21%), constipation (21%), and hypertension (20%).2 Four percent of patients discontinued pralsetinib due to TRAEs.2

Based on their marked and durable antitumor activity in patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC, selpercatinib and pralsetinib were approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2020.3,4

References
1. Goto K, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(suppl 15). Abstract 3584.
2. Gainor JF, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(suppl 15). Abstract 9515.
3. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves selpercatinib for lung and thyroid cancers with RET gene mutations or fusions. www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-approves-selpercatinib-lung-and-thyroid-cancers-ret-gene-mutations-or-fusions. Accessed January 11, 2021.
4. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves pralsetinib for lung cancer with RET gene fusions. www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-pralsetinib-lung-cancer-ret-gene-fusions. Accessed January 11, 2021.

Related Articles
Sotorasib Conveys Long-Term Benefits in Patients With KRAS G12C–Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Web Exclusives
Analysis of the long-term results of the CodeBreak 100 clinical trial showed that sotorasib demonstrated long-term efficacy, in particular among patients with low initial circulating tumor DNA values.
NGS Testing More Cost-Effective Than SGT in Oncology
Web Exclusives
A recent study showed that next-generation sequencing testing has superior cost benefit when compared with single-gene testing for multiple cancer types, including non–small cell lung cancer.
Phase 3 Study of Sotorasib in NSCLC Demonstrated Shorter PFS Than Phase 1/2 Trials
Web Exclusives
Analysis of the phase 3 study of sotorasib in patients with non–small cell lung cancer found faster time to response compared with docetaxel but a shorter progression-free survival than what was seen in the phase 1/2 trials.
Last modified: August 10, 2023

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive:

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
     
     
    Profession or Role
    Primary Specialty or Disease State
    Country