close

November 2017 VOL 8, NO 11

← Back to Issue


Category IV: Psychosocial Support, Assessment, Eighth Annual AONN+ Conference Abstracts

Screening for Supportive Oncology Patient Concerns, Analyzing Impact and Opportunities to Improve Spiritual Questions Affecting Navigation to Spiritual Resources

Stephanie Merce Boecher, RN, OCN, MSN, BSN, BA1; Julia R. Trosman, PhD, MBA2; Carol Newsom, RN3; Rosa Berardi4; Javier Macias, BA5; Dirk Labuschagne, MDiv6; Harry Miranda-Ocasio, PsyD6; James Gerhart, PhD7; Teresa Lillis, PhD7; Pam Khosla, MD8; Catherine Cassingham, MSW, LSW8; Anne Bowman, MBA, CHES9; Ana Gordon, AM, LCSW10
1Advocate Health Care;
2The Center for Business Models in Healthcare;
3Mercy Hospital and Medical Center;
4The Coleman Foundation;
5The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society;
6John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County;
7Rush University Medical Center;
8Mount Sinai Hospital;
9UnityPoint Health – Peoria;
10University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences
 

Background: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2013 report recommends that supportive oncology care start at cancer diagnosis; the Commission on Cancer (CoC) Standard 3.2 requires distress screening and indicated action. A collaborative of 100+ clinicians, funded by The Coleman Foundation, developed a patient-centric screening tool adapted from the NCCN Distress Problem List, IOM report, and CoC standards, with validated subtools: PHQ-4 for anxiety and depression and PROMIS short forms for pain, fatigue, and physical function.1,2 Novel treatment/care and other concerns were included. The screening tool was implemented at 4 cancer centers (2 academic, 1 public, and 1 safety net). Higher scores on the PHQ-4 were significantly associated with each of the following: greater pain, fatigue, nutritional and specific treatment/care concerns, and lower physical function (P <.0001).3 Participating sites voiced concerns about the 3 spiritual questions on the screening tool because they were worded to be triggered by a “No” response rather than a “Yes” response.

Objective: Assess spiritual questions on the Coleman Supportive Oncology Screening Tool and identify opportunities to improve the spiritual screening questions and navigation to spiritual resources.

Methods: The Coleman Supportive Oncology Collaborative (CSOC) analyzed patient answers to 3 spiritual questions in the CSOC screening tool at 2 cancer treatment sites (1 public and 1 academic). Descriptive statistics were used. CSOC nurses/navigators conducted discussions with chaplains to identify improved screening options as supported by recent literature.

Results: The CSOC screening tool was completed by 512 patients. The question “I have a sense of purpose or meaning” received an answer of “No” by 22.7% (116/512) of patients; the question “I feel peaceful” received an answer of “No” by 19.1% (98/512) of patients; and the question “I find strength in my faith and beliefs” received an answer of “No” by 11.5% (59/512) of patients. Additional analysis identified that 73% (72/98) of patients who answered “No” to the “I feel peaceful” question also answered “No” to 1 or 2 of the other spiritual questions. Of the remaining 26 patients, 16 patients had a PHQ-4 score of 3 or higher that triggered a navigation to psychosocial support; 8 patients with a PHQ-4 score lower than 3 stated “Yes” to practical/family concerns that triggered navigation to psychosocial support. The remaining 4 patients (<1% of 512), all had other concerns indicated on their screening tool (nutrition, treatment/care, or physical concerns) that triggered further staff navigation. CSOC chaplains encouraged rewriting screening questions to align with the paper by King et al,4 “Determining Best Methods to Screen for Religious/Spiritual Distress.” The suggestion was to remove the “I feel peaceful” question and reword the other 2 questions to be triggered by “Yes” responses.

Conclusions: Based on data analysis and spiritual literature, the CSOC navigators, chaplains, nurses, social workers, palliative care physicians, and psychologists adjusted the screening tool. The 3 spiritual questions were replaced with “Do you struggle with the loss of meaning and joy in your life?” and “Do you have religious or spiritual struggles?” that trigger navigation with a “Yes” response. Revised questions are under pilot testing at 3 cancer centers.

References

  1. Weldon C, Vance N, Scheu A, et al. A consolidated screening tool for supportive oncology needs and distress. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl). Abstract 47.
  2. Weldon CB, Vance N, Scheu A, et al. Pilot results of consolidated screening tool for distress and supportive oncology needs, AB2017-03. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15:658.
  3. Trosman JR, Gerhart J, Patel U, et al. Results of implementing a novel supportive oncology screening tool for comprehensive evaluation of distress and other supportive care needs. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl). Abstract e21644.
  4. King SD, Fitchett G, Murphy PE, et al. Determining best methods to screen for religious/spiritual distress. Supp Care Cancer. 2017;25:471-479.

Related Articles
Category II: Care Coordination/ Care Transitions, Eighth Annual AONN+ Conference Abstracts - November 3, 2017

The Oncology Nurse Navigator’s Role in Enhancing the Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference at a Community Cancer Hospital

Background: The multidisciplinary cancer conference (MCC) plays an integral role in optimizing patient outcomes in today’s increasingly complex world of cancer care. MCCs offer multiple benefits, including increased use of [ Read More ]

Category IV: Psychosocial Support, Assessment, Eighth Annual AONN+ Conference Abstracts - November 3, 2017

A Quantitative and Qualitative Quality-of-Life Evaluation of a Large Navigation Team

Background: Sarah Cannon Cancer Institute, the Oncology Service line for Medical City Healthcare in the Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas area, has a team of 13 disease-suite oncology nurse navigators and 2 [ Read More ]